<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://aew.freosanstudios.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Australian_Enthusiasts_Wiki%3AVandalism</id>
	<title>Australian Enthusiasts Wiki:Vandalism - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://aew.freosanstudios.com/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Australian_Enthusiasts_Wiki%3AVandalism"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aew.freosanstudios.com/w/index.php?title=Australian_Enthusiasts_Wiki:Vandalism&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-04T05:47:38Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.8</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://aew.freosanstudios.com/w/index.php?title=Australian_Enthusiasts_Wiki:Vandalism&amp;diff=7277&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>TheDragonFire123: Created page with &quot;{{Shortcut|AEW:VAND}} &#039;&#039;&#039;Vandalism&#039;&#039;&#039; is specifically defined on most wikis, including Australian Enthusiasts Wiki, to be a wilful edit designed to damage the wiki. This distinction is necessary because confirmed vandalism can have a different pathway of discipline than good faith but disruptive edits.  ==What is not vandalism== *Mistakes, even damaging ones, cannot be accused of being vandalism except when it is obvious that the user who made them did so on purpose. **&#039;...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://aew.freosanstudios.com/w/index.php?title=Australian_Enthusiasts_Wiki:Vandalism&amp;diff=7277&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-02-20T03:04:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{Shortcut|AEW:VAND}} &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Vandalism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is specifically defined on most wikis, including Australian Enthusiasts Wiki, to be a wilful edit designed to damage the wiki. This distinction is necessary because confirmed vandalism can have a different pathway of discipline than good faith but disruptive edits.  ==What is not vandalism== *Mistakes, even damaging ones, cannot be accused of being vandalism except when it is obvious that the user who made them did so on purpose. **&amp;#039;...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Shortcut|AEW:VAND}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Vandalism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is specifically defined on most wikis, including Australian Enthusiasts Wiki, to be a wilful edit designed to damage the wiki. This distinction is necessary because confirmed vandalism can have a different pathway of discipline than good faith but disruptive edits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What is not vandalism==&lt;br /&gt;
*Mistakes, even damaging ones, cannot be accused of being vandalism except when it is obvious that the user who made them did so on purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Not vandalism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: A user accidentally removing a row from a table when their edit summary says something to the effect of &amp;quot;Added a bus to the list&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Is vandalism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: A user removing a row from the table when their edit summary says something to the effect of &amp;quot;Losers covering buses deserve to be cancelled&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Requests for help made in the wrong venue. An accusation of vandalism can be hugely disheartening in an user&amp;#039;s formative edits and can discourage them from our community entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Not vandalism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: A user accidentally replacing a mainspace article with &amp;quot;Help I wanted to create a bus article but the wiki won&amp;#039;t let me&amp;quot;, not understanding that there are proper venues for seeking assistance.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheDragonFire123</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>