Talk:Logan Coaches: Difference between revisions
From Australian Enthusiasts Wiki
→Logan coaches: new section |
→Logan coaches: Reply |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Logan village also has alot more buses then in the Fleetlist they have about 90 buses for logan village [[Special:Contributions/~2025-1|~2025-1]] ([[User talk:~2025-1|talk]]) 14:16, 5 June 2025 (AEST) | Logan village also has alot more buses then in the Fleetlist they have about 90 buses for logan village [[Special:Contributions/~2025-1|~2025-1]] ([[User talk:~2025-1|talk]]) 14:16, 5 June 2025 (AEST) | ||
:@[[User:~2025-1|~2025-1]] Is there any information on whether 216 and 217 are considered true Translink buses, that is follow the same standards down to having the same zero-padded style of fleet numbering? Or are they actually owned by Logan Coaches (c.f. Transit Systems QLD)? [[User:TheDragonFire123|TheDragonFire123]] ([[User talk:TheDragonFire123|talk]]) 15:24, 5 June 2025 (AEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:24, 5 June 2025
Logan coaches[edit source]
The B8RLE Optimus TMR clone thingys Logan Coaches have are numbered 216 and 217
The irisbus metro cb60 that is in historic lists had a fuel leak and the back of it is burnt to a crisp in the Logan coaches graveyard
Logan village also has alot more buses then in the Fleetlist they have about 90 buses for logan village ~2025-1 (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2025 (AEST)
- @~2025-1 Is there any information on whether 216 and 217 are considered true Translink buses, that is follow the same standards down to having the same zero-padded style of fleet numbering? Or are they actually owned by Logan Coaches (c.f. Transit Systems QLD)? TheDragonFire123 (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2025 (AEST)